Experts mull changes to software patent process



Email    print   
April 27, 2009 —  (Page 1 of 3)
In response to the controversy surrounding software patents, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has tightened up considerably on granting them, and they are now harder to get than any other type of patent (except for business methods). That’s the view of Mark A. Lemley, a professor of law at Stanford Law School and director of Stanford's program in law, science and technology.

Lemley, who testified about patent reform and patent litigations in front of the U.S Senate in February, said that while patent reform in Congress has proven a long and difficult process, the USPTO has taken steps itself to tighten up the patent process.

Some patents issued by the USPTO over the years should not have been granted, said Lemley. Those questionable patents can negatively impact innovation, particularly when they are enforced against innovative companies, he added.

While a robust protection scheme is important to the economy, an excess reliance on patents is unnecessary and could be a drag on the economy in the future, said Richard Field, a past chair of the American Bar Association's section of science and technology law.

"There is confusion in terms of who owns what and who can do what," he explained. Claims and counterclaims have been the name of the game in the past, and companies need to have a portfolio [of patents] in place to even sit at the table with someone else, he said.

"These so-called patents grant ownership rights over ideas that have no reflection in the physical world other than 'I own the math,' " said Eben Moglen, founder of the Software Freedom Law Center and a professor of law at Columbia Law School. "If everyone goes looking for more in a game of phony real estate, hell will follow."

However, bad eggs have managed to slip past patent examiners largely due to a loophole in the patent process that says while a programming algorithm may preexist as a statement of math, part of it can be patented if it is tied to a process or machine, Field explained.



Related Search Term(s): patents

Pages 1 2 3 


Share this link: http://sdt.bz/33433
 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources

Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
Loading




close
NEXT ARTICLE
Why should the Supreme Court care about software patents?
A few cases are pushing patent law in new directions; should the Supreme Court take a major role in charting this course? Read More...
 
 
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 

Download Current Issue
FEBRUARY 2012 PDF ISSUE

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Want to subscribe?


 
blogs tab
GitHire: Use Headhunters to Find Your Perfect Programmer
Are you a hiring manager tired of scouring the job boards? Check out this new service that will find 5 people interested in your jobs.
02/03/2012 12:17 PM EST

Facebook claims hacker cred
Facebook's SEC S-1 filing form includes a short essay on the Hacker Way by Mark Zuckerberg himself.
02/02/2012 08:26 AM EST

Ryan Dahl steps down
Ryan Dahl, creator of Node.js, steps back from his position as gatekeeper for the project.
02/01/2012 04:58 PM EST

Bloomberg opens its API
Bloomberg's APIs could lead to a future standard for accessing market data.
02/01/2012 04:41 PM EST

The case for piracy
In the aftermath of SOPA and PIPA, some copyright holders have begun to embrace piracy as inevitable...and even beneficial.
01/30/2012 02:39 PM EST

Tablet sales boom, but applications lag
The installed base of tablet computers and e-book readers is growing rapidly, but no killer app has yet emerged -- hint, hint.
01/28/2012 05:48 PM EST

 
Events calendar tab
2/13/2012 to 2/16/2012
Santa Clara
TechWeb

2/26/2012 to 2/29/2012
San Francisco
BZ Media

2/27/2012 to 3/2/2012
San Francisco
RSA

3/4/2012 to 3/7/2012
Las Vegas
IBM Tivoli

3/5/2012 to 3/9/2012
San Francisco
TechWeb