LOGIN | REGISTER NOW | SUBSCRIBE
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 
Download Current Issue
ISSUE 2/1/2010 PDF

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Receive the print Edition?


 
blogs tab
Visual Studio 2010 Release Candidate Available Today
A Visual Studio 2010 release candidate is available on MSDN.
02/09/2010 09:45 AM EST

Is Microsoft eyeing Office subscription pricing?
Microsoft may be preparing to offer a new Office pricing option called "union," which charges the same for cloud as on-premises.
02/01/2010 09:38 AM EST

Facebook rewrites PHP runtime
Facebook is about to open source its own PHP runtime, written from scratch for speed.
01/30/2010 08:53 PM EST

 

Events calendar tab
Macworld 2010
2/9/2010 to 2/13/2010
San Francisco
IDG World Expo

SPTechCon 2010
2/10/2010 to 2/12/2010
San Francisco
BZ Media

PyCon 2010 (Python Conf.)
2/17/2010 to 2/25/2010
Atlanta
Python Software Foundation

Southern Calif. Linux Expo
2/19/2010 to 2/20/2010
Los Angeles
SCALE

IBM Pulse
2/21/2010 to 2/24/2010
Las Vegas
IBM


 
print Printable version 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources
Facebook brings HipHop to PHP
HipHop compiles PHP to speed up the Web layer at world's most popular social networking si...

Adobe moves LiveCycle application platform to the cloud
Release gives developers just what they need to create targeted business process-oriented ...

Oracle acquires AmberPoint
Today's merger will probably affect most of AmberPoint's existing partnerships with other ...

Digg!  Digg
Reddit  Reddit
Slashdot  Slashdot
Share on facebook  Facebook
Share on Twitter  Twitter

What a Sun-IBM merger could mean for Java


By Andrew Binstock
March 23, 2009 — 
The acquisition of Sun by IBM raises several interesting possibilities, especially in regard to the wide array of Sun software that is likely to be affected. Here are some thoughts on the effects of the deal on key technologies.

Java. Several pundits have speculated that if IBM controlled Java, the language and platform would be even more open source than it is, and that problems such as product conformance tests for OSS versions of Java would go away. This is probably correct. However, the one thing that will not happen is IBM ceding control of Java to a third party. In other words, while the JCP might be dismantled (though I doubt it), some system will remain in place by which IBM can pursue its agenda in Java.

The reasons for this are woven into IBM’s genetic material. Big Blue has always had a strong preference for OSes and execution environments that it can control. This preference took what the company viewed as a very bad turn when IBM teamed up early with Microsoft on the PC. All went well until the infamous spat that led to the Windows-OS/2 split.

When that occurred, according to what IBM insiders told me years ago, the company recognized that it could never again put the fate of its operating systems in the hands of a third-party vendor. For that reason, IBM was attracted to Java for its enterprise apps. It could run them on its own and just about any other operating systems. Because of this, it enthusiastically endorsed Java.

However, IBM soon realized that Sun would only let it in so far. Sun’s wariness of IBM has been a longstanding sore spot for Big Blue. So, having acquired Java in this transaction, IBM is hardly going to turn over control to another third party. Expect the direction of Java to be influenced by IBM for the foreseeable future.

Enterprise Java. WebSphere is a well-established Java EE server, while Sun’s various EE server initiatives have gone nowhere. I expect the Sun EE offerings will fade away; the open-source software products could live on, but I doubt IBM will give them enthusiastic support.

Java Tools. IBM has already developed a solid IDE that it turned over to the Eclipse Foundation. I can see no scenario in which it would adopt or extend NetBeans. I suspect NetBeans will be cut loose as an open-source project to live or die by how much its existing community supports it. A similar fate might well befall language projects like JRuby.

Even though it only takes a couple of engineers to keep a language moving forward, I am not sure IBM will see much value in this. And IBM’s record in new language development is not great. You might recall that the first major scripting language for Java was IBM’s NetRexx, an excellent product that I have discussed several times in my column. But IBM put little effort into marketing it, never open-sourced it, and eventually reassigned the principal engineer to other projects.

Databases. MySQL is the obvious prize here. Rebranded as part of the DB2 product line, it could easily be Big Blue’s ticket into the lower end of the market, that is, the sub-enterprise and SMB space.

Right now, IBM’s free version of DB2 is akin to the free version of Oracle: a scalability-limited placeholder for small businesses that might want to try out the databases. MySQL, by comparison, has wide industry support and no artificial limits on database size or number of processors, so instead of being a push tool like the free DBMS products, it can become a pull product that encourages users to step up to paid versions of DB2. Pulling that off will require careful marketing by IBM, a company not known for its prowess in that area.

Operating Systems. Solaris is a far superior version of Unix than AIX. In the Unix community, AIX has always been viewed as a technologically weak variant. I expect that IBM will either migrate AIX customers to a relabeled version of Solaris, or it will migrate some superior features of Solaris (such as ZFS) to AIX, thereby significantly bolstering its capabilities. Some of these features are likely to appear in IBM’s Linux as well.

The companies’ respective cloud-computing efforts, which are both embryonic, will surely be merged. The future of this technology is too compelling to throw out either IBM’s or Sun’s research and preliminary deliverables.
Beyond the software components are the hardware aspects of this deal: IBM will surely close down the SPARC processor line over several years and move the SPARC engineers to the Power and PowerPC processor design team. SPARC Niagara was an innovative product and IBM will surely want to hang on to those designers. Sun’s storage business will be something IBM either sells off or quietly folds into its enterprise storage product line.

Overall, in my opinion, for the few billion dollars this deal costs Big Blue, this acquisition is a stellar bargain.


Related Search Term(s): IBM, Java, Sun


Share this link: http://www.sdtimes.com/link/33356
 

Comments

03/24/2009 09:25:54 AM EST

And now Apple wish they had made the move few month back.

United KingdomAlex


03/24/2009 03:53:28 PM EST

We are looking for companies or individuals who use Java to participate in an online poll regarding the future of Sun and Java. I am forwarding this to you to try to get a picture of the level of support for a proposal that's being floated - for the Java community to contribute yearly support to Sun Microsystems in order to keep them independent and directed on development of open source software. Please feel free to forward this to individuals or corporate partners you think might be interested. Cordially. Participate in Poll: Would you give money to Sun to keep it independent and developing products? Vote here: http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/426985 View current results: http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/426985/results Participate in message forum: http://www.misterpoll.com/forums/192808

United Statessoftwarevisualization


03/29/2009 09:24:29 PM EST

If I'm not mistaken, IBM's project zero uses groovy. Also I see a lot of tutorials concerning groovy in IBM developers blog. Maybe Jruby will suffer from this merger but dynamic languages in the JVM will move on with SpringSource supporting groovy. Hopefully, IBM will focus on the JVM and Java.

United StatesOracio


04/05/2009 12:56:40 AM EST

On an individual level, have to say that my own personal wish is to see ZFS natively supported (i.e. GPL'd) in Linux--which has to be more probable now with IBM. While I'm at the wishing well, I'd like DTrace too. Those two things are the only reason I have a nearby OpenSolaris box.

United StatesGaren Parham


Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading