Most Read Latest News Blog Resources
Digg!  Digg
Reddit  Reddit


            iphoneapp GET THE APP!

Sam Ramji: GPL is challenging for Microsoft




January 29, 2009 —  (Page 1 of 3)
Microsoft acknowledges that the GNU General Public License is an important license, but the company believes that it is challenging to work with. That’s the view of Sam Ramji, Microsoft’s senior director of platform strategy.

Nearly eight years have passed since Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer infamously declared Linux to be a "cancer," and that the GNU General Public License would have required Microsoft to make its entire software portfolio open source. It has since enabled GPL-based technologies through partnerships and has softened its viewpoint.

GPL is a so-called copyleft license, a scheme that requires subsequent authors who use GPL-based code in their applications to surrender some of their intellectual property rights in order for contributions to be distributed back to the open-source community.

 
Ramji has taken a much more pragmatic view of the license than Ballmer once did. He doesn’t call it a cancer, but he maintains that while the GPL is important due to the volume of code licensed under it, it only represents two out of the 54 Open Source Initiative-approved open-source licenses.

However, that assertion overlooks the quantity and importance given to GPL-licensed software, says Bradley Kuhn, a policy analyst and tech director at the Software Freedom Law Center. The SFLC is not a disinterested party: It is a partner with the Free Software Foundation, which wrote the GPL, and sues companies that are believed to be violating its copyleft requirements.

"That statement is akin to saying that 'India and China are merely two of the 192 (or more) countries in the world'. Microsoft doesn't refuse to operate in India and China simply because those are only two countries among so many," Kuhn said as a direct response to Ramji’s comments.

Kuhn estimated that at least 60% of open-source software uses a version of the GPL license. "Microsoft is happy to take lots and give back a tiny fraction. This 'new message' from Microsoft is the same as the old one, with some cosmetic changes," he said.

Related Search Term(s): GPL, Microsoft, open source

Pages 1 2 3 


Share this link: http://www.sdtimes.com/link/33224
 

Comments

01/30/2009 12:05:32 AM EST

The problem is not GPL. Lots of entities in the world are using GPL because it fits with their business model. In case of Microsoft, GPL doesn't fit with their business. The problem is making sure the GPL doesn't creep, unintentionally, into their code base. There are solutions out there (we use Protecode, but there are others) that make sure code base is kept clean and the company's IP policy is not inadvertently violated, avoiding a Linksys/Cisco/GPL type scenario.

United StatesAnthony Chambers


Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



 
 
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 
Download Current Issue
ISSUE 8/1/2010 PDF

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Receive the print Edition?


 
blogs tab
Like Ruby n' Rails
Programming languages and Web frameworks go together like peas n carrots. Or Ruby n' Rails.
07/30/2010 04:36 PM EST

Adobe buys a Web-based IDE
Adobe looks to buy a rapid and agile Web development environment.
07/28/2010 03:49 PM EST

OpenStack opens up
OpenStack looks to be an intriguing new idea for running clouds.
07/28/2010 01:56 PM EST

 

Events calendar tab
8/1/2010 to 8/5/2010
Boston
SHARE

8/2/2010 to 8/6/2010
Redmond, Wash.
1105 Media

8/9/2010 to 8/13/2010
Orlando
Agile Alliance

8/23/2010 to 8/26/2010
San Jose
S&S Media

8/30/2010 to 9/2/2010
San Francisco
VMware