GPLv3: What a Long, Strange Trip It’s Been


Richard Stallman ruminates on the process of producing the new GPL


Email    print   
July 15, 2007 —  (Page 1 of 2)
With the GPLv3 revisions complete, the time of decision for developers has begun. But while only time will tell whether the GNU/Linux kernel moves to GPLv3, one thing is certain: The GPL revision process is forever changed. For keeper of the GPL flame Richard Stallman, the days of going it alone are history. While Stallman has no plans for the community now built around the revision process for GPLv3, he recognizes that the way in which the revisions were developed was a win for all parties involved.

Stallman originally created the GNU Public License in 1989. Two years later, he was working on an updated version of the license. “For GPL version 2, I knew of certain problems I wanted to deal with. I spoke with our lawyer, and we worked out solutions and then we published it. At the time, the GPL was not very much used by programs that weren’t part of the GNU system,” said Stallman.

But when the time to revise GPLv2 came last year, Stallman and the Free Software Foundation decided to try something new, something approaching democracy. So for the past year, individuals within the open source community have submitted their comments on the new version of the GPL. In some ways, this new focus on community mirrors the changes that have taken place in software as well as its licensing over the past 15 years, thanks to the GPL itself.

“It is a process of giving everyone a chance to look for errors. We’ve got to be a lot more careful with the GPL than with our programs,” said Stallman. That’s because the GPL can’t be constantly refined and revised, unlike the software it governs.

The ability to distribute modified GPL code in black-box hardware without releasing source code for the modifications has been snuffed out with the release of GPLv3, said Stallman. “We had a lot of changes in the ways to address the dangers of ‘Tivo-ization,’ and a way to deal with software patents and the threats they make. We’re trying to protect free software from a fate worse than death,” he claimed.




Pages 1 2 


Share this link: http://sdt.bz/30942
 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources

Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
Loading




close
NEXT ARTICLE
Escaping from the “How Long?” time trap
A solid agile implementation requires good time-management and time-tracking skills, which can be hard to develop Read More...
 
 
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 

Download Current Issue
FEBRUARY 2012 PDF ISSUE

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Want to subscribe?


 
blogs tab
Are you at risk for burnout?
Burnout is a severe problem and it can strike at any time. Here's how to tell if you are nearing the edge.
02/09/2012 02:16 PM EST

Agility, mom, and apple pie
If we're to evaluate the state-of-the-art in software development, we should start with the values espoused in the Agile Manifesto.
02/07/2012 11:57 AM EST

RIM woos developers with free tablet
How do you get more apps ported to the BlackBerry PlayBook? By giving every developer a free tablet, of course!
02/04/2012 01:57 PM EST

GitHire: Use Headhunters to Find Your Perfect Programmer
Are you a hiring manager tired of scouring the job boards? Check out this new service that will find 5 people interested in your jobs.
02/03/2012 12:17 PM EST

Facebook claims hacker cred
Facebook's SEC S-1 filing form includes a short essay on the Hacker Way by Mark Zuckerberg himself.
02/02/2012 08:26 AM EST

Ryan Dahl steps down
Ryan Dahl, creator of Node.js, steps back from his position as gatekeeper for the project.
02/01/2012 04:58 PM EST

 
Events calendar tab
2/13/2012 to 2/16/2012
Santa Clara
TechWeb

2/26/2012 to 2/29/2012
San Francisco
BZ Media

2/27/2012 to 3/2/2012
San Francisco
RSA

3/4/2012 to 3/7/2012
Las Vegas
IBM Tivoli

3/5/2012 to 3/9/2012
San Francisco
TechWeb