GPL 3.0 Revision Offers Patent Protection


New clause written by FSF offers covenant for users, developers


Email    print   
August 15, 2006 —  (Page 1 of 2)
A July revision of the controversial Free Software Foundation’s GNU General Public License 3.0 draft adds a covenant to protect users of patented GPL software from legal action.

The prior draft of the license had drawn ire because of its unclear language in regard to patented GPL software.

Eben Moglen, general counsel of the FSF and co-author of the license, said, “We’ve spent a lot of time listening to a lot of people. We’ve done a good deal of redrafting and responding to ideas developed in the course of the spring.”

Moglen included, with the second draft, an audio recording in which he explains the reasoning behind some of the changes in this draft. Among those reasons, he cited the expansion of digital rights management and the danger of GPL software being used as bait for patent lawsuits as two of the primary concerns addressed in this new draft.

“You certainly wouldn’t want someone suing a user of free software for patent infringement. We want to make sure that nobody turns a patent or a patent license into a way of making a program that is free in appearance un-free in reality,” said Moglen in an interview with SD Times.

The newly added patent covenant appears in the completely revised section 11 of the second GPL 3.0 draft. In this section, the GPL reads, “You receive the Program with a covenant from each author and conveyor of the Program, and of any material, conveyed under this License, on which the Program is based, that the covenanting party will not assert (or cause others to assert) any of the party’s essential patent claims in the material that the party conveyed, against you, arising from your exercise of rights under this License.”

Essentially, said Moglen, this new paragraph means that the rights granted in the GPL cannot be suspended by a software patent. But, Moglen added, this does not mean that software licensed under the GPL cannot be patented: If a developer patents software that’s licensed under GPL 3.0, the developer cannot then mandate that end users have a patent license in order to modify said program.




Pages 1 2 


Share this link: http://sdt.bz/29491
 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources

Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
Loading




close
NEXT ARTICLE
SFLC: Microsoft violated the GPL
Microsoft violated the GPL when it distributed its Linux Integration Components for Hyper-V without releasing the source Read More...
 
 
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 

Download Current Issue
FEBRUARY 2012 PDF ISSUE

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Want to subscribe?


 
blogs tab
Are you at risk for burnout?
Burnout is a severe problem and it can strike at any time. Here's how to tell if you are nearing the edge.
02/09/2012 02:16 PM EST

Agility, mom, and apple pie
If we're to evaluate the state-of-the-art in software development, we should start with the values espoused in the Agile Manifesto.
02/07/2012 11:57 AM EST

RIM woos developers with free tablet
How do you get more apps ported to the BlackBerry PlayBook? By giving every developer a free tablet, of course!
02/04/2012 01:57 PM EST

GitHire: Use Headhunters to Find Your Perfect Programmer
Are you a hiring manager tired of scouring the job boards? Check out this new service that will find 5 people interested in your jobs.
02/03/2012 12:17 PM EST

Facebook claims hacker cred
Facebook's SEC S-1 filing form includes a short essay on the Hacker Way by Mark Zuckerberg himself.
02/02/2012 08:26 AM EST

Ryan Dahl steps down
Ryan Dahl, creator of Node.js, steps back from his position as gatekeeper for the project.
02/01/2012 04:58 PM EST

 
Events calendar tab
2/13/2012 to 2/16/2012
Santa Clara
TechWeb

2/26/2012 to 2/29/2012
San Francisco
BZ Media

2/27/2012 to 3/2/2012
San Francisco
RSA

3/4/2012 to 3/7/2012
Las Vegas
IBM Tivoli

3/5/2012 to 3/9/2012
San Francisco
TechWeb