Is Borland Relevant Anymore?



Email    print   
March 1, 2005 —  (Page 1 of 2)
At the beginning of this year, Borland announced its annual earnings. While it managed to stay in the black for the second year in a row, the posted numbers reveal a grim dimension: Borland’s revenue from product licenses declined year over year. Given that this past year has been universally hailed as a rebound for technology, this decline is not good news. However, when you compare results of the three large pure-play vendors of programming tools (Borland, Compuware, and Mercury Interactive), the emerging picture is grimmer yet. Compuware’s license revenues grew 12 percent in the nine months ending the same quarter as Borland’s report, while Mercury Interactive’s grew 27 percent. So, what is the matter with Borland, then, that it was down 2 percent?

As far as I can tell, two things: lack of product innovation and poor execution. Before the current problems, some terrible executive decisions severely hurt the company: the acquisition of VisiBroker, the name change to Inprise, the near acquisition by Corel. These events cast the company in an uncertain light.

Coming after the disastrous acquisitions of Ashton-Tate and Paradox, the constant changes in the company’s direction made developers and their managers gun-shy about committing to strategies that looked fickle and indecisive. Over the course of the past few years, Borland has certainly changed that perception. Everyone now knows it sells an enterprise-oriented toolchain that is particularly strong in Java. It also has a few oddball products like Delphi that, while not moribund, are unlikely to see much adoption.

Almost as if to overcome the lack of direction of preceding administrations, the current executive team has been stuck in a prolonged product stasis that is starting to hurt sales. Borland acquired several well-respected technologies, such as Together, Caliber RM, OptimizeIt and StarTeam, stuck them to the Builder IDE, and sold the lot as a lightly integrated toolchain. This worked because the acquired products were solid and had loyal customers.




Pages 1 2 


Share this link: http://sdt.bz/28455
 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources

Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
Loading




close
NEXT ARTICLE
Borland organizes test results in Silk 2009
Silk 2009 also integrates with the VersionOne agile software project manager to combine test results and user stories Read More...
 
 
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 

Download Current Issue
FEBRUARY 2012 PDF ISSUE

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Want to subscribe?


 
blogs tab
Are you at risk for burnout?
Burnout is a severe problem and it can strike at any time. Here's how to tell if you are nearing the edge.
02/09/2012 02:16 PM EST

Agility, mom, and apple pie
If we're to evaluate the state-of-the-art in software development, we should start with the values espoused in the Agile Manifesto.
02/07/2012 11:57 AM EST

RIM woos developers with free tablet
How do you get more apps ported to the BlackBerry PlayBook? By giving every developer a free tablet, of course!
02/04/2012 01:57 PM EST

GitHire: Use Headhunters to Find Your Perfect Programmer
Are you a hiring manager tired of scouring the job boards? Check out this new service that will find 5 people interested in your jobs.
02/03/2012 12:17 PM EST

Facebook claims hacker cred
Facebook's SEC S-1 filing form includes a short essay on the Hacker Way by Mark Zuckerberg himself.
02/02/2012 08:26 AM EST

Ryan Dahl steps down
Ryan Dahl, creator of Node.js, steps back from his position as gatekeeper for the project.
02/01/2012 04:58 PM EST

 
Events calendar tab
2/13/2012 to 2/16/2012
Santa Clara
TechWeb

2/26/2012 to 2/29/2012
San Francisco
BZ Media

2/27/2012 to 3/2/2012
San Francisco
RSA

3/4/2012 to 3/7/2012
Las Vegas
IBM Tivoli

3/5/2012 to 3/9/2012
San Francisco
TechWeb