LOGIN | REGISTER NOW | SUBSCRIBE
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 
Download Current Issue
ISSUE 2/1/2010 PDF

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Receive the print Edition?


 
blogs tab
Visual Studio 2010 Release Candidate Available Today
A Visual Studio 2010 release candidate is available on MSDN.
02/09/2010 09:45 AM EST

Is Microsoft eyeing Office subscription pricing?
Microsoft may be preparing to offer a new Office pricing option called "union," which charges the same for cloud as on-premises.
02/01/2010 09:38 AM EST

Facebook rewrites PHP runtime
Facebook is about to open source its own PHP runtime, written from scratch for speed.
01/30/2010 08:53 PM EST

 

Events calendar tab
Macworld 2010
2/9/2010 to 2/13/2010
San Francisco
IDG World Expo

SPTechCon 2010
2/10/2010 to 2/12/2010
San Francisco
BZ Media

PyCon 2010 (Python Conf.)
2/17/2010 to 2/25/2010
Atlanta
Python Software Foundation

Southern Calif. Linux Expo
2/19/2010 to 2/20/2010
Los Angeles
SCALE

IBM Pulse
2/21/2010 to 2/24/2010
Las Vegas
IBM


 
print Printable version 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources
Facebook brings HipHop to PHP
HipHop compiles PHP to speed up the Web layer at world's most popular social networking si...

Adobe moves LiveCycle application platform to the cloud
Release gives developers just what they need to create targeted business process-oriented ...

Oracle acquires AmberPoint
Today's merger will probably affect most of AmberPoint's existing partnerships with other ...

Digg!  Digg
Reddit  Reddit
Slashdot  Slashdot
Share on facebook  Facebook
Share on Twitter  Twitter

Could BPMN 2.0 Make BPEL a Moot Point?


By Jennifer deJong
July 1, 2006 — 
At its technical meeting in Boston in late June, Object Management Group was expected to review the proposed specification for version 2.0 of the Business Process Modeling Notation standard, with capabilities that some say could make the widely adopted Business Process Execution Language redundant.

With the vote for adoption expected in September, BPMN 2.0 will allow BPMN diagrams created in one tool to run in others that comply with the standard. And enabling interoperability at the diagram level—instead of at the code level—raises questions as to how Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) will fit in.

“Once you can share BPMN across tools, that significantly reduces the need for BPEL,” said Deepak Singh, CTO of Adeptia, a Chicago-based company that sells business process management software.

BPMN is a graphical notation spec that defines a common way to depict business processes, using standard shapes—circles, rectangles with rounded corners and diamonds—and various types of connecting lines to indicate how the shapes are related. BPMN 1.0, adopted last year, specifies compliance at the shape level, explained Jeanne Baker, chair of the Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI), the OMG steering committee responsible for BPMN. But there is no way to share diagrams across products from different tool makers, she said.

BPMN originated in 2004 as a way for people who aren’t programmers to graphically depict the steps involved in business processes. While BPMN is not a replacement for BPEL—BPMN expresses a process, while BPEL executes a process—noted Baker, BPMN addresses a key shortcoming of BPEL. The execution language has no way to describe the human steps typically involved in business processes.

BPMN is essentially an abstraction layer for the business user. But it also serves as the interface for developers, said Adeptia’s Singh. “Business people create process flows, while [developers] expand them,” adding detail to enable the behind-the-scenes integration to take place, he said.

Goodbye, BPEL?
BPMN doesn’t come with built-in BPEL mappings, noted Phil Gilbert, CTO for Lombardi, an Austin, Texas-based maker of business process management software. “But tools that support BPMN, including those of Adeptia and Lombardi, among others, generate BPEL code. That’s largely because BPEL is a widely accepted standard,” said Gilbert. But there is no reason why BPMN couldn’t generate code in other languages. “If a BPMN-based picture accurately reflects the business process, the means of execution is irrelevant,” he said. “Code can be anything. It can be Java. It can be C.”

Gilbert believes BPMN 2.0 spells the end for BPEL designers because instead of interoperating at the code level, tools will exchange information at the model level. “Everyone is moving to this notation. BPMN is the de facto standard,” he said.

Analyst Bruce Silver, who heads an Aptos, Calif.-based consultancy of the same name, agreed. “In 18 to 24 months, no one will use BPEL designers.”

An estimated 40 tool makers support BPMN, according to OMG chairman and CEO Richard Soley. IBM counts itself among that number, but the company doesn’t believe BPMN 2.0 will make BPEL unnecessary.

“There’s a huge future for BPEL,” said IBM’s director of business process management, Inhi Cho. “You can’t do BPMN alone.” The details of how to enable the interchange of the modeling notation haven’t been worked out yet, she said, referring to Business Process Definition Metamodel (BPDM), a specification currently under development at the OMG. BPDM will define a repository for BPMN diagrams.

Cho also believes that BPEL will be extended to support interaction between people. Adeptia’s Singh didn’t disagree. “BPEL has to evolve to become a complete language,” he said.


Share this link: http://www.sdtimes.com/link/29417
 

Comments

05/23/2009 06:15:07 AM EST

Neither BPMN or BPEL fully describe all the necessary entities for process management and what they describe is way to rigid. Those who believe that BPMN can be executable must be blind or ignorant. All the key definitions of what makes the process alive are missing. The 'data and content artefacts' are what makes a process a process, not just an add-on. The rules are hidden inside some silly 'gateway' and there is no definition whether an activity is executing some method, something that a user does or wheter it is a state change in an entity. There are no definitions of goals, rules, content and user presentation. It is simply unusable. Therefore BPMN 2.0 is still incredibly ambiguous and it is left to the (jBPEL) programmer to make it work. When he leaves, you have the same maintenance issue as with any othe program. How will that increase the mouch vounted agilty? Get real, please!

United StatesMax Pucher


Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading