LOGIN | REGISTER NOW | SUBSCRIBE
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 
Download Current Issue
ISSUE 7/1/2009 PDF

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Receive the print Edition?


 
Is the mystery Borland suitor Serena?
Borland software is considering an offer from another company after a preliminary deal with MicroFocus. Is Serena the new company?
06/30/2009 01:55 PM EST

Windows 7 - An eBayer's dream product?
Windows 7 pre-orders can make people money on eBay.
06/29/2009 03:48 PM EST

Know thine cloud provider
Cloud computing require companies to understand compliance and regulation. Third parties will play a big role in regulated industries.
06/29/2009 02:58 PM EST

 

Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conf.
7/13/2009 to 7/16/2009
New Orleans
Microsoft

OSCON (Open Source Convention)
7/20/2009 to 7/24/2009
San Jose
O'Reilly Media

XBRL Technology Workshop & Summit
7/28/2009 to 7/30/2009
Santa Clara
XBRL US

ACM SIGGRAPH
8/3/2009 to 8/7/2009
New Orleans
ACM SIGGRAPH

OpenSource World (formerly LinuxWorld)
8/12/2009 to 8/13/2009
San Francisco
IDG World Expo


 
print Printable version 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources
Kapow automates website data retrieval
Kapow Technology's Web Data Server 7.0 can be used to create modules that navigate through...

COBOL’s future lies in the clouds
After 50 years of use in businesses, COBOL is still lingering around mainframes. But the s...

Oracle's Fusion 11g lays groundwork for ERP platform
Fusion's components are standards-based and integrated, but some abilities are lost if non...

Digg!  Digg
Reddit  Reddit
Slashdot  Slashdot
Share on facebook  Facebook
Share on Twitter  Twitter

Larry O’Brien: Erlang: What the Cool Kids Are Doing


By Larry O'Brien
October 15, 2007 — 
Geepster, n. A person who derives his or her identity by mastering complex, but lesser-known, technologies; a geek hipster.

Erlang, n. What all the geepsters are using now that they let anyone code in Ruby.

The psychology of the “early market” adopters is brutal. Enthusiasts and visionaries convincingly sing the praises of this programming language or that architectural model, articulating advantages and emphasizing the “game changing” nature of the technology. Thousands of blogs are launched, dozens of books are printed, a clutch of conferences convened: The technology is poised for total and utter dominance of the software development world! Then everyone moves on to the next thing.

I’ve long advocated the model explained in Geoffrey Moore’s “Crossing the Chasm,” with its ruinous chasm between “early” and “mass” markets, as the best for understanding the adoption of software development technologies. I don’t want to rehash that belief, but I feel sorry for those in the Ruby and Rails communities, who must be feeling a little jilted right now. To be clear, I believe that Ruby actually has “crossed the chasm” and will see wholesale adoption in the enterprise. Microsoft’s IronRuby project has tremendous potential when coupled with the Dynamic Language Runtime and Silverlight 1.1, while Sun’s JRuby project has not just shipped, but appears to be ticking off incremental milestones with ease.

Meanwhile, CodeGear, the company formed from Borland’s languages division, has shipped the first version of a dedicated IDE for Ruby called 3rdRail, and SapphireSteel, whose Ruby In Steel plug-in for Visual Studio has been my preferred IDE for Ruby development, has made a .NET-to-Ruby bridge available for free download. But the blogosphere’s encomiums to Ruby have definitely waned, and recent Technorati searches have been more likely to turn up sour “this would be easier in PHP” posts than the rapturous testimonies of the past few years. Such is the fate of technologies running the gantlet of the skeptical mass market.

In the meantime, the geepsters have moved on to Erlang. Erlang is not short for “Ericsson Language,” but rather is named after A. K. Erlang, an early telecomm theorist (who’s also, I am told, the namesake of a dimensionless unit of telecomm traffic volume). The fact that Erlang was developed and matured within Ericsson is a happy coincidence. Until recently, Erlang was viewed in the programming language community as a commercial (and therefore somewhat suspect) language suited primarily for telecomm and perhaps other embedded systems. The surge in interest has been driven primarily by the release of Joe Armstrong’s excellent tutorial book “Programming Erlang: Software for a Concurrent World” (Pragmatic Bookshelf) and the growing realization that we are, indeed, entering that “concurrent world.”

Erlang implements the “Actor” paradigm for concurrency, whose essential component is very fine-grained asynchronous messaging flowing between lots of processes (it’s worth noting quickly that Erlang’s processes do not have anything like a 1:1 mapping to OS processes). As I’ve mentioned in recent columns, this is one of several alternatives to the lock-based model embodied in .NET and other mainstream platforms. Although it’s far too preliminary to crown any of these alternatives as a complete solution, nothing but good can come from more people taking them out onto the roads for a spin.

While creating thousands of processes is the thrill that is causing the most excitement right now about Erlang, it also has a fascinating “hot swap” capability that allows you to replace modules dynamically without losing state or restarting the application. Obviously, this is part of Erlang’s telecomm legacy, but the thought of a system that never has to be taken out of service for upgrading is heady stuff.

Erlang’s syntax may be intimidating at first glance, and its lack of a modern IDE off-putting, but those are exactly the sorts of things that enthusiasts and visionaries can look past in favor of a technology’s unique virtues. Of course, in three years, you can expect me to start screaming that what Erlang needs is an editor with decent code completion.

Larry O’Brien is a technology consultant, analyst and writer. Read his blog at www.knowing.net.


Share this link: http://www.sdtimes.com/link/31222
 

Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading