| DISABLE AUTO REFRESH
 
SD TIMES BLOG
 
jhildebrand

Today's Hot Field: Robotics

by J.D. Hildebrand 08/31/2011 10:02 AM EST

When I was a kid, I wanted a robot. Heck, I wanted to build my own robot. My dream came true years later when I got my first Lego Mindstorms kit. Of course, I wanted my robot to understand and speak English, and I was really hoping it would be intelligent.

I was a lonely kid. I was just looking for a friend. Okay?

Robots were a far-off dream during my childhood, but they have since become commonplace. And if the experts are right, robot technology will continue to expand its role in our lives.

But you don't have to take my word for it. You know who's cashed in his chips and decided to devote the next part of his career to robotics? James Gosling.

That's right. The inventor of Java, after a brief (and apparently fruitless) tenure at Google, has joined a start-up called Liquid Robotics. The company's business is built around a sort of floating robot that traverses the ocean, gathering data, analyzing it, and beaming it home.

At the other end of the cost and complexity spectrum – but still incredibly cool – is the RoboKing Triple Eye, a new robotic vacuum cleaner that communicates via cell phone.

New Scientist maintains a good set of articles about breakthroughs in robot applications and technology here. If you'd rather check out innovations in robotics live and in-person – with no PowerPoint presentations from the marketing department, guaranteed – consider attending the next Maker Faire in your area. (Here's some footage from YouTube to give you a taste: Maker Faire 2008 – Robots!)

I shouldn't have to remind you that robots and cool programming challenges go together. Robotics has hit critical mass in several industries and is set to explode into more in the near future. There's still time to get in at the ground floor. Why not go for it?

Web recommendation: Take a look at James Gosling's blog. You know of Gosling as the creator of Java. But he's also a family man and an explorer at programming's frontiers. His site will keep you up-to-date on his new work developing software for far-roving robots. J.D. says check it out.

J.D. Hildebrand has written hundreds of articles for dozens of publications and online communities dedicated to software development. He recently relocated to a small town outside Belgrade – stop by if your travels take you through Serbia.

Currently rated 1.6 by 34 people

  • Currently 1.588235/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Share this link: http://www.sdtimes.com/blog/1834

Tags:

People | robots | software development

jhildebrand

Artificial (Yawn) Intelligence

by J.D. Hildebrand 08/19/2011 06:34 AM EST

 

I can't put my finger on the exact day it happened, but sometime during the past decade or two I lost my interest in artificial intelligence.

I remember what it was like to be inspired by the thought of truly intelligent systems. I paid my dues playing with neural-network systems downloaded off the pre-Web net. I thought that AI research must be the most glamorous and exciting job in the software field.

Today, announcements of advances in natural-language processing, computer vision, robotics and other subdomains of AI scroll down my screen without meriting a click. The field no longer seems interesting. What happened?

Part of it, I suppose, is that AI has delivered on many of its early promises. Optical character recognition was once a pipe dream – now it's a standard feature of scanner drivers. Grammar checking relies upon techniques once the domain of bushy-haired AI researchers – now it's a baseline feature for any text-processing application. Computer games and input devices routinely incorporate algorithms that were once considered AI.

For all this progress, and despite the impressive results AI systems have achieved playing chess and Jeopardy, AI simply isn't exciting anymore. The technology has led to incremental improvements in existing applications, not paradigm-shifting world changers.

I guess I read too much science fiction as a kid. Somewhere lodged in my childhood dreams is the fantasy that one day I would speak to a computer as another being, and learn about its thoughts and feelings. Grammar-checking is too mundane a reality for the grand promise of AI. I wanted computers to come alive.

Two of my favorite books are centered around intelligent computers. Robert Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Moon_Is_a_Harsh_Mistress), from the golden age of hard science fiction, is a recasting of the American Revolution on the moon, with an intelligent computer network named Mike playing a central role. Richard Powers's Galatea 2.2 (http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/06/21/specials/powers-galatea.html ) is a more nuanced tale of a quest to teach a rapidly evolving neural network to read and understand great works of literature. Your life will be richer if you read these books; I recommend them.

Does the thought of intelligent systems still make your heart beat a little faster? Then check out AI Jobs (http://www.aijobs.net/), a Web site that lists jobs in AI research and applications. There are still advances to be made in the field. Both the incremental advances that make the world go 'round and the paradigm-shifting ones that will banish my torpor. There are still mountains to climb in AI – go on, follow your dreams.

Web recommendation: Don't expect the links at the bottom of these musings to stick to the theme, in general. My mind usually jumps around in too undisciplined a manner to maintain such a correspondence. But this time, I need to send you to Kurzweil Accelerating Intelligence (http://www.kurzweilai.net/), a mind-expanding Web site devoted to advances in intelligent technology. The site – you can subscribe to a worthwhile newsletter there too – is part of a loose federation of Web sites and business sparked by the work of visionary Ray Kurzweil. J.D. says check it out.

J.D. Hildebrand has written hundreds of articles for dozens of publications and online communities dedicated to software development. He recently relocated to a small town outside Belgrade – stop by if your travels take you through Serbia.


Currently rated 1.6 by 38 people

  • Currently 1.631579/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Share this link: http://www.sdtimes.com/blog/1823

Tags:

silly | People | robots | General | robotics | software development

drubinstein

Not so elementary, Watson

by David Rubinstein 02/15/2011 11:51 AM EST

Like many of you, I'm a huge fan of the "Jeopardy" quiz program, and last night's episode -- pitting past champions Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter against IBM's "Watson" computer -- was truly fascinating. Through the years, humans have been preoccupied with the idea of machines replacing us in many facets of society. From the recent film "Surrogates" to "Terminator" to the works of Nebula Award-winning author Isaac Asimov, many gallons of ink have been spilled and miles of film shot for stories of machines helping society, then turning against us, forcing humans underground to survive. "Man vs. Machine" is a recurring theme in literature and movies, and it played out nicely on television last night. My favorite moment was when show host Alex Trebek

admonished the computer for giving the same incorrect answer that Jennings had just given -- "Ken just said that, Watson!" On straight trivia questions, the computer excelled, as expected. When it had to piece together two different concepts into the same answer, it had its problems. One "answer" was "Stylish elegance, or students who all graduated in the same year." The computer replied, "What is chic," clearly understanding the first part of the answer but failing to grok the second part. I could just imagine the team of IBM scientists behind the scenes, furiously rewriting algorithms for language comprehension. Of course, it's all been taped and decided already, but it'll be interesting to see how Watson fares tonight in the "double Jeopardy" round, and how Jennings and Rutter do as well.

Currently rated 1.5 by 2 people

  • Currently 1.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Share this link: http://www.sdtimes.com/blog/1734

Tags:

IBM | robots

ahandy

How's This For Programming?

by Alex Handy 12/11/2008 05:26 PM EST

When you get your mind right, dancing is just an elaborate programming problem coupled with some good music.

Currently rated 4.5 by 2 people

  • Currently 4.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Share this link: http://www.sdtimes.com/blog/1292

Tags:

robots | robotics | code

 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 

Download Current Issue
MAY 2012 PDF ISSUE

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Want to subscribe?


 
blogs tab
Why we leave
Ten reasons good workers leave their jobs, plus a few suggestions for retaining them.
05/22/2012 06:14 PM EST

Creation
To write better software, cultivate your ability to be creative.
05/19/2012 07:40 PM EST

Slick...but who needs it?
compilr.com is a well-designed site and the folks behind it seem to have their heart in the right place. But...who needs it?
05/16/2012 12:45 PM EST

How to be a better software developer
Want to be a better developer? You won't get there by mastering an interesting language or learning a new set of APIs.
05/14/2012 12:18 PM EST

Wooing Galatea
Do yourself a favor and check out Galatea 2.2, a wonderful book by novelist Richard Powers.
05/12/2012 07:05 PM EST

The world as story
An artificial-intelligence system at Carnegie Mellon seeks to understand the world by making statements about it.
05/10/2012 06:39 AM EST

 

Events calendar tab
6/3/2012 to 6/7/2012
Orlando
IBM Rational

6/10/2012 to 6/15/2012
Las Vegas
SQE

6/10/2012 to 6/15/2012
Las Vegas
SQE

6/11/2012 to 6/14/2012
Bellevue, Wash.
AMD

6/11/2012 to 6/14/2012
Orlando
Microsoft