Well then, our little entry on Google
building its own router made quite a splash, didn't it? I've
contacted both companies, today, and as yet, neither wants to say
peep either for or against the story. But I've been reading the
comments all over the blogosphere, and felt a few clarifications on
this rumor are in order.
First of all, Juniper isn't a one trick
pony. The company has lots of other big customers, and it's even
backing into the switch market, now, with some really cool lower
stack hardware. However, Google is undoubtedly a major
chunk of the “buys the biggest, newest thing” sector of the
Juniper economy. In a market where that means paying upwards of a
million dollars per router, that can really be bad for the bottom
line. Plus, in an entirely unsubstantiated rumor I've also heard
recently, Verizon is slowly moving towards boutique router makers, so there are more reasons to be bearish on Juniper than just the
Google aspect. In this economy, every customer matters. With Google being the closest and biggest customer for Junipers big boxes, this could really damage the company. I stand by the predicition that Juniper is in major trouble here.
Another area people are confused on is what these boxes Google is working on are. They are not switches. We all knew about those already. These are routers.
The thing many people seem to be
missing in this story is why Google would be doing this. If you're
paying $10 million for a box that routes your traffic, and another
couple thousand a month for service and support, it's easy for an MBA
to see where the budget can be tightened. Especially if your company
has great engineers and some people poached from Cisco on its staff.
Not to mention the fact that Google is
increasingly pushing the limits on every aspect of its services.
Think about this for a moment: backbone transports are essential to
making the Internet work. But when you get right down to it, most
telecoms have these in big lines where they can follow problems in
their network and track down issues on their own turf. Google must be
set up, internally, in a similar way. But then, the company has to
colo around the world. It has to offer its services at high speeds in
China, Africa, Europe, the US, and can you imagine how much traffic
Orkut alone generates in Brazil? Everything about Google is growing.
And the services and products it offers are growing constantly as
well. Unlike telecom, where most of the cables and centers are well
established, and filled with government mandated transfer points,
Google's worldwide network must be a hodge podge of rented land,
self-built facilities, and all manner of local phone pipes. Google's needs must by wildly unique.
It stands to reason that the demands of
Google are very different from the demands of Verizon, AT&T, or
even Akamai. YouTube alone is a massive bandwidth suck, and Google
has to push those videos into all manner of foreign telecom networks
at ludicrous rates. Telecoms know how to deal with those foreign
worlds. I'd estimate that Google is either hiring its way into those
worlds, or discovering how they work on a daily basis.
On another front, the best form of
security, these days, is obscurity. Google leaves one Juniper router
open accidentally, and there's a JUNOS nerd in there screwing things
up. Google leaves its own proprietary box open accidentally, and
maybe a disgruntled employee can mess it up. Much smaller pool of
danger, really.
Finally, Google probably needs new
routers on a daily basis. Buying those takes time, effort, and sales
contracts. Who wouldn't want to weasel out of yet another sales
obligation with a company that's talented, but pricey. From the right
angle, Juniper is basically the designer Cisco. The Apple to Cisco's
Microsoft.
The fundamental message of this rumor
-- and keep in mind this is all just a rumor at the moment -- is that
Google is working on routers for its own use. They might have
something to do with its dark fiber. They might be targeted at
internal usage or VPN distribution around the world. We just don't
know. I can tell you one thing, though: Google won't be selling these
things. Probably won't open source them either. This is their
solution to an internal problem, and it's probably heavily influenced
by the bottom line.
I'd wager that Google is pretty upset
about this rumor being out there now. I bet Juniper rakes them over
the coals on the next sales contract negotiation. Precisely why I
can't name my sources, though. Heads would roll.
Anyway, this is a blog. It's a blog
about a rumor. I have very high confidence in this rumor, as I heard
it from multiple sources in unrelated places over a period of three
months. Lord knows I've been wrong in the past, so don't shoot the
messenger here. I'm just keeping all you wonderful people in the
loop. Would you prefer we reported on love affairs, like Valleywag?
We thought not.