LOGIN | REGISTER NOW | SUBSCRIBE
 
print Printable version 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources
CouchDB brings peer-based data replication
This NoSQL database is now production ready for developers who want to spread data out wit...
Experts: UML is active, but the buzz is lost
Since widespread acceptance, there is little enthusiasm around the language even ahead of ...
Compuware intros new GUI for mainframe tools
Beyond the GUI are plug-ins for data and debugging tools, as well as an OEM edition of Sli...
Black Hat conference fields suggestions for software security
Attendees give a wide variety of ideas about the subject, with Rex Black adding in some of...
Digg!  Digg
Reddit  Reddit
Slashdot  Slashdot
Share on facebook  Facebook
Share on Twitter  Twitter


            iphoneapp GET THE APP!

TmaxSoft replicates mainframes on open systems


By David Rubinstein
January 18, 2010 —  A Korean software company is looking to gain a share of the North American application modernization market with a suite of software designed to “lift and shift” applications off of mainframes and onto open platforms, claiming it will reduce costs.

TmaxSoft, founded in 1997 and boasting of US$100 million in revenue last year, is releasing OpenFrame 6.0, an execution environment for running mainframe applications on Linux or Unix. “It replicated the functionality of core software infrastructure support on the mainframe, such as CICS and VSAM,” said John Plato, vice president of sales and marketing at TmaxSoft.

“We clone that functionality and the APIs on Unix and Linux, and run [the applications] intact. All we have to do is recompile. We don’t have to touch the business logic.

“Mainframe maintenance costs are in some cases borderline outrageous, especially if they’re adding capacity every year,” he said. “The $10 million check [mainframe users] write is based on mps capacity. People are looking to offload to the specialty engines: the Zips, Zaps and IFLs. We’re riding the coattails of that trend.”

Yet Karl Freund, vice president of strategy and marketing for IBM System z, said, “We have found it’s hard to get an apples-to-apples” comparison of the costs of running a mainframe versus building out a data center. “Some costs are just not accounted for.

"[Mainframe migration] companies will tell our customers they can save millions by moving you off the mainframe. But is the data center you’re moving into properly sized? Is disaster recovery and application continuity in place? Often, you end up with a very different answer” about the cost of migrating.

Freund acknowledged there are “certain cases” where mainframe costs “got out of line" with their value based on the workload the computer was required to handle.

To address that, IBM in December released 11 mainframe “solution editions” for specific workloads, such as SAP, disaster recovery and Chordiant CRM, said Freund.

“We were able to drive prices down dramatically and keep it in line with the value it was bringing to the business. There’s no question that [System z] has better attributes” than x86 servers—disaster recovery, security and reliability were but three areas Freund noted—“and now we can justify incrementally higher prices for these things.”

But TmaxSoft’s Plato maintained that moving off the mainframe is “an attractive tactical solution to people who want to stop the [cost of mainframe] bleeding.”

OpenFrame 6.0 provides the platform (transaction processing engine, middleware and more), so applications look and act just as they did on the mainframe, Plato said. The software basically sends the source code via FTP to the open-system box, where it’s recompiled and run on the OpenFrame software platform, he explained.

“We’re not converting COBOL to Java,” he said. “Organizations don’t want to have to retrain 20,000 people to reuse the application. They want to look and act the same.”


Related Search Term(s): IBM, mainframes, TmaxSoft


Share this link: http://www.sdtimes.com/link/34064
 

Comments

01/18/2010 04:12:10 PM EST

Just re-compiling source-code on another software platform is a very simple way of positioning a re-hosting process. Maintaining the program source-code after the re-hosting many times may costs more and delutes the advantages. A complete review of the existing applications and processes to evaluate the most appropriate way to move forewards with or without the "old" code is here recommended. New software utilities in the form of available ERP systems or development tools are worthwhile to consider before taking the proposed approach. The suggested process, is comparable to putting an old antiquated engine in a new car chassis.

United StatesFrans Reitsma


01/28/2010 08:04:51 PM EST

One of the attributes that makes rehosting so attractive is that there is literally no re-training of users in order for them to use the application. It is the exact same application they had on the mainframe. The impact on an organization to rewrite the code into a more current technology (ie Java) plus the cost of re-training the entire user base, plus re-training or hiring new IT employees to support the rewritten application make solutions such as Tmaxsoft's extremely unique to large organizatoins.

United StatesMarc McAvoy


Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



 
 
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 
Download Current Issue
ISSUE 8/1/2010 PDF

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Receive the print Edition?


 
blogs tab
Like Ruby n' Rails
Programming languages and Web frameworks go together like peas n carrots. Or Ruby n' Rails.
07/30/2010 04:36 PM EST

Adobe buys a Web-based IDE
Adobe looks to buy a rapid and agile Web development environment.
07/28/2010 03:49 PM EST

OpenStack opens up
OpenStack looks to be an intriguing new idea for running clouds.
07/28/2010 01:56 PM EST

 

Events calendar tab
SHARE
8/1/2010 to 8/5/2010
Boston
SHARE

VSLive
8/2/2010 to 8/6/2010
Redmond, Wash.
1105 Media

Agile 2010
8/9/2010 to 8/13/2010
Orlando
Agile Alliance

Delphi Live
8/23/2010 to 8/26/2010
San Jose
S&S Media

VMworld
8/30/2010 to 9/2/2010
San Francisco
VMware