Integration Watch: From open source to commercial quality: A study in rigor



Email    print   
October 15, 2009 —  (Page 1 of 3)
For the last year, our company has been working with a client that is moving from a purely open-source model to a commercial product. The OSS product is already widely used, so the first year has consisted of setting up the corporate entity, creating the support infrastructure, and building a sales team while closing deals with users who were eager to get a commercial license and/or priority tech support. Next year, working from an established base of customers will see a stronger push for sales at sites not familiar with the product.

The model is slightly unusual: a self-funded OSS company is a rara avis. As a result, there are no case studies to build on, and much of the details of this particular model have to be learned on the run.

One particularly interesting set of changes occurs in product development and management as the transition from OSS to commercial quality is undertaken. Some readers, especially OSS diehards, will view this as a false dichotomy. Nothing in the OSS model should imply software of less than commercial quality. At least, not in theory.

This particular project consists of roughly half a million lines of code that were written primarily to solve a specific set of problems. The developers had certain business needs, wrote a solution, and shared it as OSS. They also wrote more than 600 pages of documentation. However, they did not design the product to compete with commercial offerings. Over the years, other contributors added pieces here and there to solve other specific problems: generally, just enough code to obtain a specific feature.

As a result, one of the first things we’ve done with the product is to decide what features to remove. What features are partially implemented with no likelihood of completion? What features add nothing to the value proposition of the product? What features that are not central are more trouble than they’re worth? All of these features are being removed and put into a separate OSS resource pool that users can adopt, while keeping those bits out of the commercial offering.



Related Search Term(s): open source

Pages 1 2 3 


Share this link: http://sdt.bz/33835
 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources

Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
Loading




close
NEXT ARTICLE
Git changes how developers manage source code versions
At this year's Git Together, developers praise the platform's convenience and its ability to make source control easier. Changes for the future will focus on making it more Web 2.0-compatible by offering more on-demand repositories on GitHub Read More...
 
 
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 

Download Current Issue
FEBRUARY 2012 PDF ISSUE

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Want to subscribe?


 
blogs tab
Are you at risk for burnout?
Burnout is a severe problem and it can strike at any time. Here's how to tell if you are nearing the edge.
02/09/2012 02:16 PM EST

Agility, mom, and apple pie
If we're to evaluate the state-of-the-art in software development, we should start with the values espoused in the Agile Manifesto.
02/07/2012 11:57 AM EST

RIM woos developers with free tablet
How do you get more apps ported to the BlackBerry PlayBook? By giving every developer a free tablet, of course!
02/04/2012 01:57 PM EST

GitHire: Use Headhunters to Find Your Perfect Programmer
Are you a hiring manager tired of scouring the job boards? Check out this new service that will find 5 people interested in your jobs.
02/03/2012 12:17 PM EST

Facebook claims hacker cred
Facebook's SEC S-1 filing form includes a short essay on the Hacker Way by Mark Zuckerberg himself.
02/02/2012 08:26 AM EST

Ryan Dahl steps down
Ryan Dahl, creator of Node.js, steps back from his position as gatekeeper for the project.
02/01/2012 04:58 PM EST

 
Events calendar tab
2/13/2012 to 2/16/2012
Santa Clara
TechWeb

2/26/2012 to 2/29/2012
San Francisco
BZ Media

2/27/2012 to 3/2/2012
San Francisco
RSA

3/4/2012 to 3/7/2012
Las Vegas
IBM Tivoli

3/5/2012 to 3/9/2012
San Francisco
TechWeb