Print

Supreme Court strikes down Bilski patent claim



David Worthington
Email
June 28, 2010 —  (Page 1 of 2)
The United State Supreme Court's ruling in Bilski v. Kappos today affirmed a lower court's decision to strike down a patent, but was too narrow to appreciably abate the confusion around which computer software patents are valid, experts say.

The central issue of the case involved the validity of a patent claim for a business method for hedging risks in commodities trading. After the Court spent more time deliberating than any other patent case since the early 1990s, it agreed with a lower federal court ruling that the business method was not patentable.

The federal circuit court ruled in 2008 that while it is okay to have an invention that has a computer in it that performs computations, that pure computation in general is not patentable. It also suggested the creation of a "machine-or-transformation" test that would be used to determine the eligibility of a process for patenting.

The Supreme Court's ruling strengthened the "abstract idea" exclusion from patentability, but failed to provide an actual test or to give guidance to inventors, defendants or the United States Patent and Trademark Office, said James Grimmelmann, an associate professor at New York Law School. There will be continued uncertainty and confusion around the validity of existing software patents, he added. The abstract idea exclusion is a reference to the principle that laws of nature and abstract ideas are not patentable, he explained.

Some people claim that all software is an abstract idea, because programming is just a form of mathematics, Grimmelmann said. Others think that software is often concrete enough to be patentable because it's implemented on physical computers, or that those computers control other machinery, or that because the algorithms are actually specific enough not to be "abstract," he explained. "The Supreme Court appears to come down somewhere in the middle, but doesn't really say where."

Mark Lemley, a professor at Stanford Law School and director of Stanford's program in law, science and technology, credited the court for ruling as narrowly as possible, but acknowledged that many issues still have to be resolved. "There aren't any tests in this area that work. They can all be manipulated and/or lead to undesirable lines," he said.



Related Search Term(s): patents

Pages 1 2 


Share this link: http://sdt.bz/34447
 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources

Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
Loading




close
NEXT ARTICLE
Why should the Supreme Court care about software patents?
A few cases are pushing patent law in new directions; should the Supreme Court take a major role in charting this course? Read More...
 
 
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 

Download Current Issue
MAY 2012 PDF ISSUE

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Want to subscribe?


 
blogs tab
Creation
To write better software, cultivate your ability to be creative.
05/19/2012 07:40 PM EST

Slick...but who needs it?
compilr.com is a well-designed site and the folks behind it seem to have their heart in the right place. But...who needs it?
05/16/2012 12:45 PM EST

How to be a better software developer
Want to be a better developer? You won't get there by mastering an interesting language or learning a new set of APIs.
05/14/2012 12:18 PM EST

Wooing Galatea
Do yourself a favor and check out Galatea 2.2, a wonderful book by novelist Richard Powers.
05/12/2012 07:05 PM EST

The world as story
An artificial-intelligence system at Carnegie Mellon seeks to understand the world by making statements about it.
05/10/2012 06:39 AM EST

The Rise of the Brogrammer, or the Rise of the Sexist Programmer?
Women in Silicon Valley get vocal about sexist ads and campaigns that contribute to a tense work environment.
05/09/2012 03:14 PM EST

 

Events calendar tab
5/23/2012 to 5/24/2012
Chicago
IEG

6/3/2012 to 6/7/2012
Orlando
IBM Rational

6/10/2012 to 6/15/2012
Las Vegas
SQE

6/10/2012 to 6/15/2012
Las Vegas
SQE

6/11/2012 to 6/14/2012
Bellevue, Wash.
AMD