LOGIN | REGISTER NOW | SUBSCRIBE
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 
Download Current Issue
ISSUE 7/1/2009 PDF

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Receive the print Edition?


 
Is the mystery Borland suitor Serena?
Borland software is considering an offer from another company after a preliminary deal with MicroFocus. Is Serena the new company?
06/30/2009 01:55 PM EST

Windows 7 - An eBayer's dream product?
Windows 7 pre-orders can make people money on eBay.
06/29/2009 03:48 PM EST

Know thine cloud provider
Cloud computing require companies to understand compliance and regulation. Third parties will play a big role in regulated industries.
06/29/2009 02:58 PM EST

 

Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conf.
7/13/2009 to 7/16/2009
New Orleans
Microsoft

OSCON (Open Source Convention)
7/20/2009 to 7/24/2009
San Jose
O'Reilly Media

XBRL Technology Workshop & Summit
7/28/2009 to 7/30/2009
Santa Clara
XBRL US

ACM SIGGRAPH
8/3/2009 to 8/7/2009
New Orleans
ACM SIGGRAPH

OpenSource World (formerly LinuxWorld)
8/12/2009 to 8/13/2009
San Francisco
IDG World Expo


 
print Printable version 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources
Kapow automates website data retrieval
Kapow Technology's Web Data Server 7.0 can be used to create modules that navigate through...

COBOL’s future lies in the clouds
After 50 years of use in businesses, COBOL is still lingering around mainframes. But the s...

Oracle's Fusion 11g lays groundwork for ERP platform
Fusion's components are standards-based and integrated, but some abilities are lost if non...

Digg!  Digg
Reddit  Reddit
Slashdot  Slashdot
Share on facebook  Facebook
Share on Twitter  Twitter

Red Hat tops list of corporate Linux code contributors


By Alex Handy
September 18, 2008 — 
When it comes to donating code to Linux, Red Hat is the company that contributes the most, according to Greg Kroah-Hartman, maintainer of the USB and other subsystems in the Linux kernel.

Speaking at the Linux Plumbers Conference, he gave a keynote address that examined the contributions of those who've made Linux what it is today. All of these lists tracked contributions as patches, not initial donations to Linux.

The overall largest contributions to Linux code come from individuals who have no apparent affiliation with any company, as Kroah-Hartman surmised by looking at their e-mail addresses. Red Hat came in second overall, with 11,846 patches.

By comparison, Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu Linux, is the 79th most active contributor, with 100 patches. Kroah-Hartman said that such behavior on the part of Canonical will be detrimental to the company and the Ubuntu distribution over time.

“Then there are the distros that base themselves off of other distros, like Ubuntu and [Lance Davis'] CentOS. These distros have yet another layer between them and the original developers. Patches rarely, if ever, flow backwards into an upstream distro, and the developers are very unlikely to push their changes into the upstream packages as they don't feel the need or don't realize the issues involved as they rely on the upstream distro so tightly,” said Kroah-Hartman.

The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is another point where many large companies contribute to Linux. Software development tools company CodeSourcery leads the list of corporate contributors to the GCC.

CodeSourcery sells numerous derivatives of GCC, including G++, a bundled Eclipse and GCC suite for Linux and Windows. Red Hat, IBM, Novell, Google, Intel and AMD rounded out the GCC corporate contributors top ten list, in that order.

Elsewhere in Linux, Kroah-Hartman's calculations showed that IBM was the second-most prolific company in its contributions to Linux, with Novell, Intel, Oracle, the Linux Foundation and SGI rounding out the top ten list. The rest of the list was filled with individual contributors.

According to Kroah-Hartman, Red Hat led in contributions to X.Org and binary utilities code, while Linux manual pages came primarily from Google and the Linux Foundation.

Kroah-Hartman implored developers to put the Linux kernel first in their development priorities, to the point of advocating that they resign if their companies wouldn't meet their needs.

“What happens is if you are out here, working for a company that doesn't allow you to contribute upstream due to internal company issues, or just a lack of time allowed due to other things, that can be a problem for a developer who wants to contribute upstream but can't,” said Kroah-Hartman.

“The solution? Quit and go work for one of the companies that allow you to do this! … Right now, there is a very huge scarcity in developers who know how to do this kind of work. Lots and lots of companies are trying madly to train their internal engineers on how to work with the community, in this kind of very different development model. They are looking for and need people that already know how to do this kind of thing. So don't sell yourself short at all. Your skills are wanted and needed, so either tell your current employer that you need to have the time to do this kind of upstream work, or change to a company that knows this already."


Related Search Term(s): Linux, open source, Canonical, Red Hat


Share this link: http://www.sdtimes.com/link/32870
 

Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading