mValent survey highlights application complexity
Stories Columns Opinions Resources
Sun extends Groovy, PHP support to NetBeans
Version 6.5 of the IDE will see complete support for those two languages along with comple...
|
Sun reorganizes its software production infrastructure
Facing economic hardships, lost revenue and loss of employees, Sun has split its software ...
|
Adobe steers Flash toward RIA implementation
At this year's Adobe MAX Conference, the focus was on Flash, this time making Flash more o...
|
BigLever builds a bridge to SCM with Gears
The Gears Universal Configuration Management Bridge allows CM systems to integrate with Ge...
|
SOA Watch: New economic realities
In the current economic downturn, agile programming and SOA are attractive options that bu...
|
Integration Watch: A new twist on threads
The key to raising the efficiency of multiprocessors is to shrink the overall workload by ...
|
Integration Watch: The Return of NetRexx?
Java scripting languages are seeing a surge in popularity, with NetRexx looking particular...
|
Windows & .NET Watch: Transaction crowd gets a boost
With multicore chips becoming the standard for processors, the need for a flexible, usable...
|
From the Editors: Election should shake up JCP
Rod Johnson has the right ideas for opening up the Java Community Process, and he may be a...
|
Letters to the Editor: Sun gives REST, SOAP choice
A reader takes issue with a headline on our story about Sun working with REST along with S...
|
Guest View: Be smart and lazy
The optimal solution for problems is the simplest one, so always aim to streamline your ap...
|
Zeichick's Take: From EXEC to EXEC 2 to REXX to NetRexx
Andrew Binstock's column last week, "The Return of NetRexx," brought back some fond memori...
|
Practical tips for saving money on code maintenance
If software design is expensive, well, code maintenance is even more so. When you look...
|
Transform your app-dev quality by involving the whole community in testing
As the saying goes, the more eyes you have on software, the shallower the bugs. That’...
|
Build your dev and test labs for less – a lot less – with virtualization
You don’t have the budget to equip developers and software test teams with all the har...
|
Software Common Hacks and Counterattacks: A Guide to Protecting Software Products against the Top 7 Piracy Threats
Software piracy continues to be a growing epidemic. This white paper examines prevalen...
|
By Jeff Feinman
August 19, 2008 —
Enforcing configuration consistency across multiple environments is the main factor in automating configuration, change and release management actions in application infrastructures, according to figures from mValent.
The company, which sells automation software for application infrastructures, gathered input about IT teams’ priorities in managing applications and services for its study, titled “Challenges on the Road to Automating Application Infrastructure,” released on Aug. 14. Among the 286 IT professionals who took part in the survey, 38% called configuration consistency the key factor in automating the application infrastructure, while 33% identified improving staff productivity through automation as the primary consideration.
From the survey results, “the need for automated tools to manage all of the moving parts associated with the infrastructure that supports complex, distributed, mission-critical business applications is clear,” said Jim Hickey, mValent’s chief marketing officer.
Not surprisingly, the current economic slowdown shaped many responses, with 92% of the respondents identifying cost containment as a top priority. Additionally, 44% said their most important projects this year have to do with business applications, and 33% called IT audit and compliance the most important project focus. Speeding deployment of new applications and implementing management processes to improve IT are other priorities, respondents said.
Virtualization hasn’t been met with much enthusiasm; about 40% of survey respondents said virtualization has made their environment more complex or has made no difference at all.
“[Virtualization] lessens the problems in one area but adds to workloads and complexity in others,” Hickey said. “Because virtualization enables a ‘cut and paste’ mentality for server instances, there’s been an explosion in the number of instances. Someone needs to manage those instances and keep the configurations in sync. Hardware and power costs are down, but administrative costs are up.”
The survey found that 50% of IT staffs employ more than 10 people to manage configuration changes to applications and Web servers, middleware, databases and operating systems. Each hour of application downtime can cost companies more than US$100,000, according to those respondents.
According to mValent, installation and configuration of middleware assets and databases are time consuming for most IT teams, taking anywhere from six hours to more than a whole business day. Installing new database instances is the most complex task facing these teams.
For application and Web servers, the most difficult task is finding and fixing configuration problems. Nearly two-thirds of survey respondents said it can take three and a half hours to fix such problems.
Related Search Term(s): automation, virtualization, mValent
Share this link: http://www.sdtimes.com/link/32732