Print

Experts: Microsoft's FAT licensing terms might violate GPL



David Worthington
Email
March 12, 2009 —  (Page 1 of 3)
Microsoft's current FAT file system licensing program could hobble the development and free distribution of GPL-licensed software, says an open-source legal advocate. However, licensing terms that were once published on Microsoft's website, which have since vanished, would have been compatible with the GPL.

Last week, Microsoft sued GPS navigation device maker TomTom for allegedly violating three of Microsoft’s file-system related patents by using Linux in its GPS devices. Linux supports the FAT file system and FAT Long File Names, which Microsoft licenses. Court filings revealed that Microsoft has 18 licensees—all under non-disclosure agreements—for its FAT patents.

TomTom now finds itself between a rock and a hard place. If TomTom continues to use Linux without licensing the FAT file system, it could face legal penalties. However, if it does license the system from Microsoft, TomTom could find itself in violation of the GPL, under which the Linux kernel is licensed.

While accepting a patent licensing agreement with Microsoft does not necessarily constitute a violation of GPL v2 or GPL v3, some of the FAT licensees may have accepted per-unit terms that would bar them from distributing software under the GPL, said Eben Moglen, founder of the Software Freedom Law Center and professor of law at Columbia Law School.

Under the GPL, there is an assumed right to redistribute software into the commons. A per-unit royalty agreement would require licensees to track how many copies of GPL-licensed software were distributed and to whom, something that would make downstream redistribution an impossibility, he said.

"That is not freedom under the GPL sense," said Moglen. "Under the GPL license, people should be able to distribute [into the commons] ad infinitum. If software is running a per-unit royalty, companies are not capable of distributing under the GPL."

Moglen couldn't say whether any of the 18 deals with Microsoft involve a GPL-violating term because the agreements are confidential. Further, any royalties paid to Microsoft at a flat rate, or paid up until a maximum amount (which does not require licensees to report to Microsoft about downstream distribution or redistribution), might not violate the GPL, he added.



Related Search Term(s): Microsoft, open source, TomTom

Pages 1 2 3 


Share this link: http://sdt.bz/33327
 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources


Comments


03/12/2009 05:18:55 PM EST

Just more BS from MS.

United Statesztevenzon


03/16/2009 01:49:18 PM EST

omg quit cryin about MS. if you had intellectual property, you would want paid for it too. quit throwing stones at a company that obviously does well since no one else can compete with them.

United StatesQUITCRYINABOUTMS


Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
Loading




close
NEXT ARTICLE
Microsoft releases .NET Micro framework as open source
The new version of the framework packages source code for distribution, but cryptography libraries are not included Read More...
 
 
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 

Download Current Issue
MAY 2012 PDF ISSUE

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Want to subscribe?


 
blogs tab
Slick...but who needs it?
compilr.com is a well-designed site and the folks behind it seem to have their heart in the right place. But...who needs it?
05/16/2012 12:45 PM EST

How to be a better software developer
Want to be a better developer? You won't get there by mastering an interesting language or learning a new set of APIs.
05/14/2012 12:18 PM EST

Wooing Galatea
Do yourself a favor and check out Galatea 2.2, a wonderful book by novelist Richard Powers.
05/12/2012 07:05 PM EST

The world as story
An artificial-intelligence system at Carnegie Mellon seeks to understand the world by making statements about it.
05/10/2012 06:39 AM EST

The Rise of the Brogrammer, or the Rise of the Sexist Programmer?
Women in Silicon Valley get vocal about sexist ads and campaigns that contribute to a tense work environment.
05/09/2012 03:14 PM EST

Retriever Communications Releases RADE3
Organizations concerned about the growing popularity of bring your own device to work policies may be comforted by the release of RADE3.
05/09/2012 11:46 AM EST

 

Events calendar tab
5/13/2012 to 5/18/2012
Boston
Lean-Kanban University

5/14/2012 to 5/18/2012
Denver
IDUG

5/23/2012 to 5/24/2012
Chicago
IEG

6/3/2012 to 6/7/2012
Orlando
IBM Rational

6/10/2012 to 6/15/2012
Las Vegas
SQE