Print

A team-first approach to ALM



Email
October 11, 2011 —  (Page 1 of 3)
Carl Zetie Whether your favorite application life-cycle management tools come from commercial vendors, open-source projects, in-house development, or some mixture of all of these, it’s no secret that promoting collaboration across life-cycle tools, from requirements to development to test to build, has remained stubbornly difficult. Integrations can be complex to build, expensive to maintain, and frequently broken by tool upgrades. It’s easy to complain about tool integration, much harder to propose improvements; but there is a new approach to tool integration called Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC) that may provide the answer.

Integrating life-cycle tools has a long history. The most common approach has been to build pairwise integrations between tools, and while this is workable for a small number of integrations, the number of combinations can quickly grow unmanageably large. Version incompatibilities can also create an upgrade nightmare, often solvable only by relying on tools from a single vendor and its closest partners.

In reaction to this tangle, some vendors have attempted to build single repository solutions, with all the tools integrated around a common store. However, this limits development teams to tools integrated with the repository, which severely limits choice. This “Big Bang” upgrade simultaneously replaces every tool, migrates existing data, and recreates business processes and governance rules required to adopt the single repository. As you can tell, this is impractical for any team already invested in existing tools.

Other approaches depend on collaboration among committees of vendors, users and academics. For example, there have been attempts over the years to define a uniform meta-model for ALM assets, in the hope that this would at least facilitate the importation and exportation of assets between tools. Of course, getting so many interested parties, each with its own favored tools, to agree is, to put it politely, challenging, and the market often moves too fast for the standards setters to keep pace. Similarly, attempts to get competing vendors to integrate by standardizing around a common implementation framework stumble over the need for each vendor to protect its own investment.



Related Search Term(s): ALM, OSLC

Pages 1 2 3 


Share this link: http://sdt.bz/36001
 
Most Read Latest News Blog Resources

Add comment


Name*
Email*  
Country     


  • Comment
Loading




close
NEXT ARTICLE
Organization works to blend application, product life-cycle management
The Open Services Lifecycle Collaboration group has made it its mission to bring these two concepts together Read More...
 
 
 
 
News on Monday
more>>
SharePoint Tech Report
more>>


   

 
 

Download Current Issue
MAY 2012 PDF ISSUE

Need Back Issues?
DOWNLOAD HERE

Want to subscribe?


 
blogs tab
Slick...but who needs it?
compilr.com is a well-designed site and the folks behind it seem to have their heart in the right place. But...who needs it?
05/16/2012 12:45 PM EST

How to be a better software developer
Want to be a better developer? You won't get there by mastering an interesting language or learning a new set of APIs.
05/14/2012 12:18 PM EST

Wooing Galatea
Do yourself a favor and check out Galatea 2.2, a wonderful book by novelist Richard Powers.
05/12/2012 07:05 PM EST

The world as story
An artificial-intelligence system at Carnegie Mellon seeks to understand the world by making statements about it.
05/10/2012 06:39 AM EST

The Rise of the Brogrammer, or the Rise of the Sexist Programmer?
Women in Silicon Valley get vocal about sexist ads and campaigns that contribute to a tense work environment.
05/09/2012 03:14 PM EST

Retriever Communications Releases RADE3
Organizations concerned about the growing popularity of bring your own device to work policies may be comforted by the release of RADE3.
05/09/2012 11:46 AM EST

 

Events calendar tab
5/13/2012 to 5/18/2012
Boston
Lean-Kanban University

5/14/2012 to 5/18/2012
Denver
IDUG

5/23/2012 to 5/24/2012
Chicago
IEG

6/3/2012 to 6/7/2012
Orlando
IBM Rational

6/10/2012 to 6/15/2012
Las Vegas
SQE